BigPhil wrote:on the issue of diaries, do we really need them at all?
why not give it a miss for a few years till we get our financial house back in order?
yes i have been getting one for a number of years (late) but it is a reasonable reference, and handy to keep your fishing notes in it.an i still want one
you state that this should be discussed at an agm were on example i think the head count was no more than 35 last year in monaghan
(what a location central to everyone not!)the issue of the constitution was brought up, as it has been dating back to 1991, as i have seen from my club secretary's notes, there is still an ongoing problem,
but as usual people asking questions are being fobbed off ( i make reference to your quote)
BigPhil wrote:why not give it a miss for a few years till we get our financial house back in order?
why there is plenty of subscriptions and not a great deal of outgoings, i myself subscribed 3 times this year as i fish with 3 clubs and i know im not the only one doing this. the master angler is paid for by the clubs and this is also funds the entrance fee for the international teams. and dont make reference to the treasurers report Ive seen it.
I'm sorry but i am personally going to be a pain in the side of the federation and wont go away until i am completely satisfied that it is being run with the interest of its anglers coming first, which i would have to state it is not
please compare our national teams and international teams to other nations, you will find that they are well backed financially (which is very possible here) well managed ( over here,
HA)
proper practice session with critique and tactics to improve angling capabilities ( our managers dont even get on the boats )
there are individuals that display these qualities with our junior counter part which i am completely satisfied with and hats off and i offer my services in that respect.
ONE LAST POINT HOW MANY OF THE CENTRAL COUNCIL WOULD BE FULL TIME ANGLERS?