If the baliffs find a dead sea trout in your bag, it's pretty conclusive proof..........rab01 wrote: how would anyone ever prove that u r fishing for that species??
Sea Trout, Salmon , Licences and Draft Nets
Moderators: kieran, jd, Tanglerat, teacher
-
lazycod
-
Bradan
- SAI Megalodon!
- Posts: 1077
- Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 5:32 pm
- Location: On a beach/lake/river somewhere..
- Has thanked: 70 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Thought you might be waiting a while so I sent a friend who works for DCAL a text - he says you do need a licence.lazycod wrote:I have just sent an email to FCB for nortern ireland I will post there reply ....Bradan wrote:Rab, I see you're in Co. Down. The law as I stated applies to the Republic, I don't know what the story is in the North.
The man from DCAL says yes!
Its called fishing, not catching. If it was called catching it wouldn't be fishing!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bradan99
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bradan99
-
rab01
- SAI Sea Dog!
- Posts: 615
- Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 10:05 pm
- Location: holywood, co. down
- Been thanked: 1 time
-
Mr_Green
-
Bradan
- SAI Megalodon!
- Posts: 1077
- Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 5:32 pm
- Location: On a beach/lake/river somewhere..
- Has thanked: 70 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Its not that bad!Mr_Green wrote:sure the next thing is licenses for sea angling in total..its the only tax free arm of the sport i think..i stand to be corrected...
Actually in ROI the only species you need a licence for are salmon and sea trout. That leaves roach, rudd, bream, hybrids, pike, eels, carp, perch, tench, brown trout, and that's just in freshwater. Upwards of 40 species in saltwater.
If you lived in England/Wales or most European countries you would need a licence to fish for any species in freshwater. If you lived in Germany you couldn't fish for sport, only for food!
Its called fishing, not catching. If it was called catching it wouldn't be fishing!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bradan99
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bradan99
-
Mr_Green
-
inigo
- SAI Hammerhead
- Posts: 246
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:53 pm
- Location: Dublin
- Been thanked: 2 times
Here's another case scenario:
I'm fishing, not targetting sea trout, but I get one. Unfortunately, the lure has gone too deep and it's not possible to remove it without causing damage. Or I'm very unexperienced and the fish won't stop moving.... So the poor trout is going to die soon whether released or not.
What would you do? What would happen if you were caught with a bloody trout and no license? Would you just release it not to get in trouble? I said, probably, because otherwise some would take obvious advantage of the situation.
I'm not trying to create controversy for nothing. From the reports I read here, some people decide to keep other fish when hooks go too deep into their catch and cause them irreversible damage.
I await your opinions!
I'm fishing, not targetting sea trout, but I get one. Unfortunately, the lure has gone too deep and it's not possible to remove it without causing damage. Or I'm very unexperienced and the fish won't stop moving.... So the poor trout is going to die soon whether released or not.
What would you do? What would happen if you were caught with a bloody trout and no license? Would you just release it not to get in trouble? I said, probably, because otherwise some would take obvious advantage of the situation.
I'm not trying to create controversy for nothing. From the reports I read here, some people decide to keep other fish when hooks go too deep into their catch and cause them irreversible damage.
I await your opinions!
-
Bradan
- SAI Megalodon!
- Posts: 1077
- Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 5:32 pm
- Location: On a beach/lake/river somewhere..
- Has thanked: 70 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Ah, there's always one........inigo wrote:Here's another case scenario:
I'm fishing, not targetting sea trout, but I get one. Unfortunately, the lure has gone too deep and it's not possible to remove it without causing damage. Or I'm very unexperienced and the fish won't stop moving.... So the poor trout is going to die soon whether released or not.
What would you do? What would happen if you were caught with a bloody trout and no license? Would you just release it not to get in trouble? I said, probably, because otherwise some would take obvious advantage of the situation.
I'm not trying to create controversy for nothing. From the reports I read here, some people decide to keep other fish when hooks go too deep into their catch and cause them irreversible damage.
I await your opinions!
Technically you would be breaking the law by killing the fish. However, a good fisheries officer would probably realise you're genuine and didn't want to kill a fish, but it was gut hooked, etc and wouldn't prosecute you, but you would have to surrender the fish to them. Either way killing the fish should be a last resort, if after making every effort to return it its obvious the fish won't survive only then should you knock it on the head
Its called fishing, not catching. If it was called catching it wouldn't be fishing!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bradan99
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bradan99
-
teacher
- SAI Megalodon!
- Posts: 2417
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 2:18 pm
- Location: North Wexford
Should you surrender the salad and chips too?Bradan wrote:but you would have to surrender the fish to them
[size=75][i]"Pier fishing was, indeed, an eccentric, unproductive and extremely dull occupation, and even if we'd posessed the necessary heavy plant we decided not to attempt it."[/i] Chris Yates, Out of the Blue.[/size]
-
lazycod
re licence
I have just had a reply from FCB northern ireland regarding a licence to fish sea trout in the sea it reads
Our remit only covers inland waters, and there is no requirement to have a
rod licence to sea fish.
Many thanks
so what are DCAL talking about

Our remit only covers inland waters, and there is no requirement to have a
rod licence to sea fish.
Many thanks
so what are DCAL talking about
-
paulocallaghan
-
lazycod
-
Bradan
- SAI Megalodon!
- Posts: 1077
- Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 5:32 pm
- Location: On a beach/lake/river somewhere..
- Has thanked: 70 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: re licence
I don't know Lazy! Maybe one guy's DUP and the other's SF - might have known they'd never agreelazycod wrote:I have just had a reply from FCB northern ireland regarding a licence to fish sea trout in the sea it reads
Our remit only covers inland waters, and there is no requirement to have a
rod licence to sea fish.
Many thanks
so what are DCAL talking about
![]()
![]()
![]()
Its called fishing, not catching. If it was called catching it wouldn't be fishing!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bradan99
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bradan99
-
lazycod
Re: re licence
I don't know Lazy! Maybe one guy's DUP and the other's SF - might have known they'd never agree
[/quote]
yeah mate more green party needed or should that be orange ah F*** it don't want to start another debate
I'm away fishing

yeah mate more green party needed or should that be orange ah F*** it don't want to start another debate