Fixed Spool vs Multiplier Rod rings

Shore angling - everything welcome! The opinions expressed here are those of the private individuals and we accept no responsibility or liability.

Moderator: donal domeney

Message
Author
Esox lunatic

Fixed Spool vs Multiplier Rod rings

#1 Post by Esox lunatic »

Does the design of rings on a beachcaster (i.e. rings on a rod designed for use with a multiplier vs those on a rod for used with a fixed-spool reel) really have a great bearing on performance?

I know that the bottom rings on a rod for use with fixed spool reels are much larger to facilitate line paid out from a spool through a revolving bail arm, but can a fixed-spool reel be used succesfully on a rod designed for using a multiplier and vice versa?

I have a a very handy four-section beach rod (Penn Jetstream), which has rings for use with a multiplier (Penn Mag 525) and it performs very well (it would perform much better if I could improve my casting!).

I wonder if the rod could be used successfully with a large fixed spool surf reel? I also have a 14ft surf rod which is designed for fixed spool use. Can this be used with the Penn 525?

Some days I prefer just to takle the one rod and being able to switch reels would be handy.


E.L.
x

#2 Post by x »

The problem with the multiplier-rung rods when used with (especially a wide drum) fixed spool reel is that as the line comes off the reel in coils, it can wrap around the first eye leading to the inevitable crack-off. Using the multiplier with a fixed spool-rung rod, you won't get this problem at least.
User avatar
BigPhil
SAI Megalodon!
Posts: 2425
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 10:16 pm
Location: North Antrim
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 11 times

#3 Post by BigPhil »

in most cases you can get away with using one on the other and vice versa with no problems
Not the BigPhil from Irish Angler mag, I'm the original, i swear!!!!

Return to “Shore Angling Q&A / Forum”