As always its an interesting read, its amazing the variation in lengths of fish to weight depending on locality caught. alot of stuff from the north coast seems to be shorter than fish of the same species/weight caught on the south coast, it must be all the Ulster frys up this neck of the woods maken them short and fat
Good to see the conservation specimen being applied for Tope and the rules are stringent enough to put of all but the most determined chancers out there.
Some good rule changes as well to keep us all honest, hats of to the specimen fish committe for all the hard work they put in pulling everything together, and Bridie will have her work cut out organising the bumper crop of specimen awards this year at the annual p**s up/ ceremony in dublin.
If someone shows you a mark to fish, respect it and dont pass it of as one of your own, dont tell every man and his dog about it.
The report was ruined for me by the inclusion of McGroarys mug. Needless infliction on the angling world of a face many had hoped was retired from the sport. A real shame.
nice to see that the number of claims is at its highest this year than the last 25 years the future looks good for speci hunters might even try get my own name on next years report
bhoy32 wrote:nice to see that the number of claims is at its highest this year than the last 25 years the future looks good for speci hunters might even try get my own name on next years report
Well done to all. Didn't make it in this year, but I'll be there next year .
Some of the twaite shad didn't make it into the book. One in particular was my young lad jacko's specimen last May, the report is in the specimen section, it turned out that his specimen was a shad hybrid, couple of other lads i know had the same thing. The perks of DNA testing!
Its the way forward the fish swam off to fight another day. a couple of years ago the fish would of been killed and still no name in the specimen report if you get what I'm saying. He will just have to try and catch some more this year or even me!!
brianbru wrote:Some of the twaite shad didn't make it into the book. One in particular was my young lad jacko's specimen last May, the report is in the specimen section, it turned out that his specimen was a shad hybrid, couple of other lads i know had the same thing. The perks of DNA testing!
Its the way forward the fish swam off to fight another day. a couple of years ago the fish would of been killed and still no name in the specimen report if you get what I'm saying. He will just have to try and catch some more this year or even me!!
brian
Who would have thought there were hybrids.
Somebody is going to have to go to their shed and devise a portable bank-side DNA kit - CSI St. Mullins
same here, had three specis, two were hybrids!
As said, at least they can go and pollute the gene pool for next year!!!
Good idea of yours jim, onbank DNA kits
screeming
I wonder if there is enough submissions of hybrids will they get a seperate catergorey, similar to the fresh-water roach/rudd/bream hybrids, could be a handy way of picking up another species towards the elusive 10 species badge.
If someone shows you a mark to fish, respect it and dont pass it of as one of your own, dont tell every man and his dog about it.