To bling, or not to bling...that is the question

Shore angling - everything welcome! The opinions expressed here are those of the private individuals and we accept no responsibility or liability.

Moderator: donal domeney

Message
Author
rab01
SAI Sea Dog!
Posts: 615
Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 10:05 pm
Location: holywood, co. down
Been thanked: 1 time

#21 Post by rab01 »

i would've agreed with all who said plain rig setup but some thing happened during the summer that changed my opinion. me and the bro-in-law were float fishing for pollock, it was a deep water mark and we both set our float to the same depth and used exactly the same bait. only difference being his float was flying under every cast and he notched up a good few fish, whereas i wasn't getting as much as a bite. i gave in and put a few luminous beads on and proceeded to catch fish after fish. since then i've always put a few beads on just to put my mind at rest.
Conor P

#22 Post by Conor P »

Using beads are alright for scratching during a comp or flatfishing, but everything else you probably shouldn't use them.


Beads for thornies! :lol:
User avatar
Pat
SAI Megalodon!
Posts: 1204
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:01 am
Location: Cobh
Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 95 times

Bling

#23 Post by Pat »

What about when you are afloat fishing for cod. When using artificals colour does make a difference, even in coloured water. Surely adding colour to shore rigs will increase their effectiveness? Codling we have caught lately, not only had hardbacked crabs in their stomachs but also small sand smelts and small flounder. Would beads similate small fish at the baits and stimulate a more aggressive response?
mason jnr

#24 Post by mason jnr »

go simple - you want your bait to be as natural as it can . decorating your snoods like a christmas tree makes them heavy which prohibits the movement of your bait.
WrasseBasher
SAI Hammerhead
Posts: 283
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 7:27 pm
Location: Dublin

#25 Post by WrasseBasher »

As i said before both work, depends on where and when, and anyone who says one is better than the other is breaking the rule that there are no rules when it comes to fishing tactics. Sometimes it works sometimes i doesnt. I always find the trace it takes longest to tie is the one that gets snagged the quickest
SPECIES 2010 (16)
COD..POLLOCK..LING..POUTING..COALIE..POOR COD..WHITING..GREY GURNARD..DAB..FLOUNDER..SMOOTHHOUND..DOGFISH
MACKEREL..TWAITE SHAD..BALLAN WRASSE..CUCKOO WRASSE..
WrasseBasher
SAI Hammerhead
Posts: 283
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 7:27 pm
Location: Dublin

#26 Post by WrasseBasher »

As i said before both work, depends on where and when, and anyone who says one is better than the other is breaking the rule that there are no rules when it comes to fishing tactics. Sometimes it works sometimes i doesnt. I always find the trace it takes longest to tie is the one that gets snagged the quickest
SPECIES 2010 (16)
COD..POLLOCK..LING..POUTING..COALIE..POOR COD..WHITING..GREY GURNARD..DAB..FLOUNDER..SMOOTHHOUND..DOGFISH
MACKEREL..TWAITE SHAD..BALLAN WRASSE..CUCKOO WRASSE..

Return to “Shore Angling Q&A / Forum”